CSS Drop Down Menu by PureCSSMenu.com
 Wednesday, February 08, 2012 | 14 Rabi al-Awwal 1433
Identity
The dehijabization phenomenon
After a brief, identity-driven swell in the number of hijab wearers, there now appears to be a decline. Why did women who spent years, or decades, in hijab decide to dehijabize? What is it that women feel must be fulfilled in life without the hijab that is apparently missing while wearing it?
The headscarf was once viewed as a sign of rebellion. Western women fought for their liberation by removing confining corsets and diminishing the amount of cloth clad to their bodies in public: in short, declaring their sexuality to the masses, and inviting their approval. In clear contradistinction to the excessive glitz women are subjected to by the modern fashion, make-up and nip/tuck industry, the modern Muslim woman concealed her sexuality in public, and allowed it to flourish in private. Now, it seems a new rebellion is taking place.

Aqsa Parvez was a young, Asian-Canadian teenager was brutally murdered by her family in late 2007 for removing her headscarf (hijab). Her death remains shocking as honour killings were previously unrelated to the headscarf, but also because it was yet more evidence to show a serious desire held by hundreds of women around the world to remove their headscarves.

I moved to Egypt in 2000, as the country was going through an ‘Islamic awakening’. Left, right and centre, I saw women donning headscarves seemingly overnight - usually after listening to a lesson by Amr Khaled - the now world famous Muslim televangelist - or someone similar. Others went much further. I remember my shock when someone I knew revolutionized her wardrobe within 24 hours; gone were the low-cut tops, the glitter-clad tight-fitting hipster jeans, and knee high red suede boots. In their place: long flowing black cloaks or abayas.

For the following nine years, I lived, worked and traveled in Africa, South-East Asia, the Middle East, Europe and North America. In the midst of my travels, I noticed a startling phenomenon in the past 3 years: the removal of the cloth, once so adorningly clung to by Muslim women world wide - what I like to call “dehijabization”.

A small piece of evidence; Facebook profile pictures of girls in hijab are increasingly replaced; sometimes, the replacement picture is as simple as a woman in loose clothes with her long, flowing hair showing, while at other times it is women posing in bikinis or mini-skirts. Women all over the world are casting off the hijab.

The question remains: Why? Why did women who spent years, or decades, in hijab decide to dehijabize? What is it that women feel must be fulfilled in life without the hijab that is apparently missing while wearing it?

I decided to ask around. Some women had originally decided to wear the hijab to counteract serious sins they had committed in the past. Ironically, some women also removed the hijab because they felt that they were sinners, and were therefore unable to live up to what they felt should symbolize a woman in a hijab. A huge number of women noted that even the most religious of Muslim men were proposing to women who were not in hijab, leaving the women in hijab feeling rather inadequate; if a religious man is uninterested in a woman in a headscarf, who will be?

Many others grew exhausted of the ‘out-of-place’ feeling they had- either because they were in a majority non-Muslim country, where the hijab was viewed as dehumanizing, or because they were in a Muslim majority country which, as a consequence of Westernisation, increasingly viewed the hijab as ‘unsophisticated’ or a sign of poor education.

Yale University anthropologist Carolyn Rouse noted the hijabization phenomenon in 2004 in her book “Engaged Surrender” as one that was about identity, rather than spirituality. Post 9-11, many women felt the need to show their solidarity and oneness with the Muslim ummah. Donning of the hijab - formerly a spiritual act - achieved that political end.

With that kind of ‘Muslim uniform’ in the 21st century comes a sad if unintentional reality - the individual Muslim woman is simply aggregated into one big, undifferentiated lump, leaving her just as objectified as the “sexually liberated” non-Muslim Western woman. Many, whether in the West or in the Muslim world, choose to give her uneasy glares and glances, while boxing her as an “oppressed woman”, who has the inability to do anything unless it is explicitly related to Islam.

The flip side of the coin is that because of the same obsession with the cloth and not its meaning, Muslims in general will demand that any Muslim woman in a hijab not simply be Muslim, but morph into an infallible angel. In this regard, the blame falls much more on the Muslim than the non-Muslim, for the Muslim should know that nowhere in the Islamic tradition is the hijab a sign of perfect character. Rather, it is the fulfillment of an Islamic duty – just like many others.

In truth, it is these Muslims who I suspect bear much of blame for the dehijabization phenomenon. There is much fear mongering instilled by many present day Muslim preachers, who have somehow made the hijab tantamount with faith itself and told to prepare for an eternity in hell if living without it. Yet, where in any of the books written by of the learned scholars of this religion is there any mentioning of the hijab as one of the kaba’ir, or major sins? A sin it may be, to be sure – but is it so dire? Perhaps it is, but the Prophets, the Messengers and the scholars of this religion emphasized it much less than other duties and responsibilities. Yet, modern day preachers will emphasize it more than they will anything else.

But this brings me to the most important point of dehijabization. Women who remove the headscarf because they choose to interpret the Islamic tradition in their own way without training; they are just as problematic as these preachers. Perhaps this is the most alarming and now widespread reason for dehijabization - women who claim that the hijab is not fard (obligatory). This was cited as the most common reason used by the majority of women I have come across who have dehijabized.

Islamic law comes down to 4 things: The Qura’n, the sunna, ijma’a (consensus), and qiyas (logical judgement). Islamic law crystallized around the interpretations of experts over many centuries: those that are now extant and most common are the 4 Sunni schools of law. For centuries, scholars have learnt Islamic law through those interpretative deductions; all these 4 schools came directly from Prophetic teachings and are upheld with their own particular interpretations all over the world. People in Egypt may not realize, but they pray in accordance to the Shafi’i madhab, while those in India follow the Hanafi interpretation of prayer.

For someone who has not dedicated their life to the study of Islam to declare that they have the same ability to interpret the Qur’an as the erstwhile amateur, comes across to me as incredibly arrogant, even while they may not realize their obvious arrogance.

Yes, there are several different interpretations, but they all must come from the basis of Islamic law. But on the hijab, there is no difference of opinion. The 31st verse of the 24th chapter of the Qur’an mentions the word khimar, which unequivocally means a veil covering the head, according to the agreed upon definition by the majority of classical commentators. The commentators (mufasiroon) further comment by stating that the noun khimar (the singular of khumur) was a loosely worn veil which was worn long before the advent of Islam and long after.

However, during the period of the revelation, it was customary that women bared their breasts while covering their hair. In fact, as Arab men went off to battle, women used to bear their breasts to encourage them to be brave; in some cases, they would show their breasts during warfare. With the advent of Islam, until now, Muslim women have been showing only their hands and faces, in accordance with the prescriptions of the Prophet, and the passing of his prescriptions from that time until this day. That methodology is followed not just in terms of the hijab, an admittedly small piece of cloth, but in the whole of this religion.

It’s irrelevant what I, as an author, do or not do vis-à-vis the issue I write about. But on a personal note, I do happen to wear a hijab, in awareness of my duty. Like most women, I often think to myself that men should learn to control themselves, and how perhaps if they did, women would not be obliged to conceal their sexuality in public, and dress any way we would like. But in the final analysis, God has a hikma or a wisdom as to why He created men this way, and why He asked women to cover themselves - He Knows best and He is All-Knowing.

(Photo: kian1 via flickr under a Creative Commons license)

Darah M. Rateb is the Managing Consultant of the Visionary Consultants Group, a Muslim world – West relations research consultancy with bases in the UK, Egypt and Malaysia


parts of this article were good and spot on. i agree that muslims have brought on as much of this dehijabization as non-muslims, if not more, and i'm glad the author addresses the hijab fear-mongering and unfair pressures placed on hijabi women by other muslims.

however, the article descended into something else by the end, to the point of being downright and blatantly preachy. there was no need for her to go on about the fardness of hijab. that's not what this article is supposed to be about based on the abstract. i don't care to get into a debate about whether the hijab is fard or not, because i think both arguments can be made, and i think both can be valid. clearly, the author thinks only one pov is valid, which i personally think makes her as arrogant as she claims women of the opposite persuasion to be. i have discussed this topic with many big-name scholars, and the ones whose opinions i truly respect are the ones who have said "i understand the hijab to be fard based on my knowledge, but Allah knows best and I am willing to consider other points of view" and yes, they have said this. on top of that, some modern scholars have argued that hijab is not fard. to say there's no difference of opinion here is ridiculous.

now perhaps the author has no problem just writing off modern-day scholars because their work has not yet been "crystallized" into her one-dimensional, overly-sanctified view of islamic tradition (i agree this tradition is important, but i think she is nearly equating it with islam here, instead of seeing the madhabs as products of the HUMAN mind and therefore INTERPRETATIONS, not pure truth), but she still needs to address the reasons behind women deciding for themselves that the hijab is not fard...

that's the real question here. is it because they feel that mainstream islamic interpretation is not adequately addressing their concerns? is it because the last time any sort of "consensus" on hijab or any other issue was taken was centuries upon centuries ago, in circumstances that bear no resemblance to their modern-day lives? is it because after wearing hijab, they realize that its stated purpose bears no resemblance to the reality of wearing it?

if they feel the SCHOLARS ARE NOT DOING AN ADEQUATE JOB addressing these issues, they are going to take interpretation into their own hands OF COURSE! so isn't that the issue to be addressed?

and btw - since when was the hijab EVER a spiritual act? prayer is a spiritual act. hijab is a Social act, as in it was prescribed in response to a social issue (and in the islamic scholarly tradition, these two categories are treated very differently in relation to socio-cultural contexts). the idea of hijab as a social act is underscored by one of the author's own statements: "Like most women, I often think to myself that men should learn to control themselves, and how perhaps if they did, women would not be obliged to conceal their sexuality in public, and dress any way we would like." does she honestly think hijab makes men control themselves? i can give a thousand examples that prove that point wrong.

lastly, if the author is going to base her argument for hijab on the use of the word "khimar" in the quran, i sure hope she wears a jilbab all the time too, since "jilaabibihinna" is a word used in another verse to describe how women should dress. interestingly, i brought this up to a scholar who brushed it off and put that verse in the context of 7th century arabian dress. and yet the khimar is made into something universal and absolute...?


>>men should learn to control themselves...
>>women would not be obliged to conceal their sexuality in public

@muqarnas: very well said. Some misc thoughts on the above quote:
Perhaps, sexuality was never meant to be public in the first place. Why do some people want to express sexuality in physical form in public(abstract forms such as in literature is mostly fine)?

And, neither men nor women (who are just as desirous as men indeed) shall ever "control" themselves since desire is fully woven into our biology as the largely uncontrollable urge to reproduce. Although some philosophies say humans are special and can rise above our nafs, it shall never be so since that would be perfection and Allah says he created us to be imperfect.


This last paragraph might contribute to why people get up in arms about women's sexuality and not global warming.


Your conclusion that not wearing a hijab is just as much your conclusion as is the conclusion that hijab is not farz. Do you honestly think, as so many do, that the Muslim women who choose not to wear the hijab base it on their own, personal, interpretation? Is that how badly you think of us? I have heard this argument so many times from people who try to shame women who don't wear hijab that its really tiring. We do our own research and consult various interpretations. We're not that mindless or impressionable. (It sounds like you've bought into the Western stereotype of Muslim women.) There are scholars who will tell you that hijab is not farz. It really is not as clear cut as you state it to be.


@ muqarnas:

I agree completely. You were obviously much more eloquent in getting the point across.


I would like to continue responding to this sister's article, because even if I may not agree with everything, it is very interesting how the stress point that has touched off so many comments is the issue of moral identity, in particular, about traditional "hijab". In fact, what we see throughout this blog are some varied responses to the moral identity stressor, in much the same way that a play's characters would develop different human and flawed personalities in response to the pressures and complications of life. *Please go to domesticcrusaders.com to learn about and support it*. Those flawed human personalities make life, art, love, family, and spirituality what it is and inspire people to tell their own story.

Professor Azizah al-Hibri noted that many women want to hold on to the core of their faith despite feeling conflicted by some aspects, no matter what their faith is. Sometimes its a question of experience and learning. It can be simple or complex to wade through issues of gender relations and political relations. Even well versed people or textual scholars may concur that they go through a sort of journey (especially since such scholarship waned during colonialism) and its not easy to pick up the Quran and understand it all right away - some issues are about context, language, different interpretations etc.. Others lean towards the side of rationalism, science, learning, and universalism, and like me, intuition etc. Often people find ways to combine it in at least some respects, even citing Quranic verses that point to space travel and embroyo development. Many sincere people come up with the most noble answers they can find.

Regarding gender relations, one blogger noted that a spouse is your strongest ally, and it might provide an interesting political relations perspective to note that Muslim men can marry Christian and Jewish women. It is especially noteworthy considering that other verses deliniate alliances between groups that are hostile or not hostile to the Muslim community. How is it impossible to be allied with Christians or Jews if a Muslim man can marry a Christian or Jewish woman?

Limitations of alliances may be more in the context of hostilities for one, and also between political states. (Scholars like Dr. Umar Abdullah can explain in more detail and can give historical references to alliances and treaties formed between Muslims and other groups.)

This can only be noted by sorting through and combining verses from different parts of text. The Quran is different in that it is not a linear story.

But why can't Muslim women marry Christian or Jewish monotheists? I don't know but I have heard different reasonings. I have seen some women marry outside of their faith and their husband mock their religion. Others seem to be do alright because their husbands are decent people, but its hard to know or judge the details. The best I think Muslims can do to help women retain what they want to retain of their faith is to spread their wing kindly nonetheless.


One thing I know- women who wear hijab love to judge women who don't. I have a friend who once said something I consider very wise, "If hijab were a requirement for men, you can bet that the loosest interpetations for it's implementation would be used."
I have both hijabi and non-hijabi friends, and I have been both myself. I know many hijabis who consider themselves to be of the "most religious" and like to pass judgement on those who do not meet their piety standard. Yet many of my non-hijabi friends spend much less time engaged in gossip, backbiting and aquiring material status symbols. The non-hijabis are usually the ones who volunteer for community events, spend time helping others, and exhibit help and kindness to others. Using this piece of material as a litmus test for a piety standard is shameful. What happened to intention being the litmus test for Muslims. I know Muslim women who have had affairs while wearing hijab, I know of niqabi girls who engaged in boyfriend/girlfriend relationships while wearing niqab, which shows me that the intention is more important than the clothing. I also hate the implication that there a non-hijabi is not God concious or is somehow "less religious" I have many non-hijabi friends who dress modestly, would never wear shorts or a swim suit in public and who pray and fast, in fact one is a hafiz Quran. There are many things that Islam asks of us, some of which are mentioned many times in the Quran and stressed in the sahih hadith of our Prophet(pbuh). Giving charity, respecting your elders, taking care of your planet, etc. Who knows which of these Allah will consider most worthy?


"is much fear mongering instilled by many present day Muslim preachers, who have somehow made the hijab tantamount with faith itself and told to prepare for an eternity in hell if living without it." I loved this quote, and I wholeheartedly agree. For years I was terrified that because I sinned on a fairly regular basis that I had no "right" to wear hijab. I woke up on day though and had a question I couldn't answer, and that was the way I started to cover. It's different for every woman, but if you're not asking the question, you'll never find the answer.


I disagree with Omar. The very reason the average person is not to interpret on their own is exactly why we have people like the Taleban now.


@humanitarian: not true; you've basically delegitimized all thier mawlawis and mawlanas, many of whom are actually trained faqihs in the Deobandi school. You see, once you've bought into the de-facto priesthood of the Ulema, you have to accept even the bad guys' ulema, too. Can a Muslim really pick and choose which Ulema are "legitmiate" based on which they agree with and yet remain intellectually honest and consistent? The Taliban are as Islamic as the Progressives are in that case.


I feel it is too much to say that everyone who interprets things on their own is going to end up like Taliban. For example, a doctor at the mosque I go to sometimes does not read the tafsir (I think he is shii) anyways, but is able to draw meaning by knowing the Arabic.

I think what humanitarian means to say is that it is hard, and some verses can be read wrong. Some neo-interpretations that aren’t learned can be extreme and refuted by traditional scholarship (This is what Khaled abu-Fadl does), even as some scholars say that the doors to interpretation (the 4 schools of thought) didn’t really close or consolidate forever in the 11th century.

But if you look at Taliban, they 1) Don’t speak Arabic 2) Don’t come from accredited institutions of higher learning 3) Like other militants in the area were specifically trained for political and militant aims in schools designed for that end.

In (at the very least) the third sense, they are not like progressives or just about anyone who is called a priest or mulana. The first and second reasons also point to contrasts.


That being said, when a person does understand methodologies, it can be a beautiful thing to be able to draw insight. What I like about some scholars is that they teach the methodologies as they explain - e.g. how the Arabic is used, how to read things in context, etc. See the prologues for Muhammad Asad's tafsir. This seems to be very important so that people can eventually stand at least somewhat on their own.

And finally somethings about interpretation are simple enough and some are more confusing or mysterious.

There are distinctions between great scholars and what is considered "priesthood" these days. But what attracts people is that what they say resonates with their own intuition and reason. As Shaykh Hamza said 'People breathe a sigh of relief when they hear what they know to be true about Islam.'

To me that indicates that being true to yourself, and searching for it, is the main thing and precedes human fallibility.


I agree with Omar on this one. The Taliban do not interpret for themselves and do base their beliefs on the works of scholars. From my understanding, their version of Islam goes way back to "cold war" days when the Americans had the Saudis teach their version of Islam to the Mujahideen in order to incite in them a divine purpose for fighting. I believe it is this Saudi interpretation which the Taliban now base their Islam on. Their beliefs are too similar to many Salafi beliefs for us to think they have their own, custom-made, Taliban version of Islam.


Sorry, I keep forgetting that a lot more people read this than only the Muslims who comment on it. I've been targeting an audience who would understand what I'm saying like I normally would have before coming to DC.

Here is some explanation of the vocabulary:

Tafsir: Commentary on the verses of the Quran (the Muslim holy book which is like the Torah or Bible) which gives more explanations.

Hijab: It literally means a veil, but it has come to be used to refer to the head covering some Muslim women wear.

4 Schools of Thought = At some point in history there were many schools of thought and ways of interpreting Islam. At one point some of these were seen as going too far and I believe it was around the 1000-1100s that 4 schools of thought were consolidated. Some believe the doors of interpretations were closed after that but there are many scholars of traditional law who still apply it to modern times.

Here is some more explanation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madh'hab


salams

A few thoughts I wanted to point out:

a) The little bit about Aqsa Parvez at the top - its been pretty much established that she was NOT killed due to "taking off" her hijab; she had other sisters of similar age who did not wear hijab and were not under any pressure to do so.

b) I grant that although the author has traveled as extensively [if not more] than I have, she has actually asked Muslim women why they do or don't wear hijab. Having said that, I think its just a cyclical case of eeman going up and down, as seen in the hadith of Hanzalah [ra]. Everyone's eeman goes up and down.


Formerly MRS.A- A salaamu alaikum folks- long time no see-
I had to re-register and am now Victoria Jean- formerly known as MRS.A-

Well, I read all of the comments, and I have to say Duha- your advice is just not conducive to marital harmony-

"to remind yourself and her that you're unhappy with how she walks out; Keep reminding her you would love to go out with her but are less likely ..... surround her with good Muslim friends who will remind her."

COnstantly reminding your wife that you are unhappy with her, and then threatening to withhold your company in such an emotionally blackmailing way- is a recipe for dishamrnony.
It is also very annoying, and such a tactic will likely backfire-
besides sowing constant discord, she may come to the conclusion that she is happier without your persistent compalints and company altogether.

Muqarnas- so elegantly stated!!!

OmarG and Greybeard-- first- hello!
Now, get over yourselves puhleeze!!
I was in prison for over 2 months- and a phenomenon I noticed was, the women would get up and put makeup on every morning-
Some of them were not leaving or seeing a man for a long long time-
They competed with each other- not with a subtext of attracting men-
because no such possibilty existed. It was kind of a surprising thing to me, as I assumed the same as you guys-

I have to say, after 10 years of hijab- it is wearing on my nerves.
Especially with the summer coming- I don't relish another summer of hot sticky hair clinging to my wet neck, and a burning blanket on top of my head holding all of the heat in.
The best relief is when I come home and rip that thing off my head- because at that point- I am not loving it- I curtail my activities so that I can get somewhere and have that sweet relief.

I have always been a winter baby- happier in the cold- and it borders on torture for me.

But I still wear it- and am considering taking it off. Espcially since I really need to find a job- and working for Muslims in my past experience- (who hire a hijabi) has been pretty awful.

I am not part of the well-educated crowd, I was never able to seek a higher education but am happy with the decisions I made as they were for others, and ethically necessary.

All this business aobu tnot being knowledgable enough to make an informed decision is also wearing pretty thin.

If I was knowledgable enough, to study and read and pray- and out of the blue without even knowing one single Muslim- decide to embrace Islam- and it's words spoke to my heart enough for me to voluntarily identify myself as a Muslim-
Why would my knowledge be any less valid after 10 years?

Doesn't the intent of the heart have a great deal to do with interpretation?
I am really annoyed at hearing the exact same sources and tired old reasoning that does not really answer the deeper more subtle intent behind it.

I'm not tryin gto hide my sexuality- because there just isn't any real way to do that- I learned that at about 14.
I've been dressing really modestly all of my life- and learned very young how to fend off unwanted attention through my behavior.

I've been getting marriage proposals with and without it- so it's not that.
I wore it as a single woman for 7 years- it is now, that I am married- that I am considering it's removal.
The only thing that worries me is that I may be displeasing Allah-

And I am not entirely convinced that it would displease Allah if I lost the hijab, as I don't actually think she was displeased with me before I even became Muslim.

I am not finding very compelling reason to keep it on- to be honest.
Anyone here have any?


rats- i forgot i could preview here so please forgive the spelling errors- Ghulam- great posts as always!


first, please don't follow duha's marriage advice
i'm sure she has good intentions, but I'll assure that saying things like she suggests will backfire

the topic of hijab gets me so tired

i think the reason why we are witnessing a dehijabization is because of the hijabization wave and the wrong reasons behind it
a lot of people hijabed for the wrong reasons...political reasons defiance of the west blah blah blah

sigh
people need to chill about it
people put hijabis under so much pressure i's ridiculous
I'm a practicing muslim, and I don't think hijab has helped me much along the path
And the article is fine except for the preachy end
it made me want to barf (and I agree that hijab is fard etc)


ISLAM CAME DOWN IN STAGES AND SO CHARACTER BUILDING IS IN STAGES. KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION IS DAY BY DAY. A HOUSE IS BUILD BRICK BY BRICK AND SO ON. I HEARD AN IMAM IN A QUDBA SAY "THAT THE IMAN OR FAITH FLANCTUATES THROUGHOUT THE DAY EVERY DAY." IT GOES UP AND DOWN DEPENDING ON THE INTENTIONS OF ONES' DAILY DEEDS/ACTIONS. I'M A MAN AND A LOT OF TIMES DON'T PRAY AND YET OTHER TIMES I SPEND A WHOLE DAY IN THE MASJID. SO IF A WOMAN WEARS A HIJAB ONE DAY AND NOT THE NEXT IT IS JUST THE TRIALS OF LIFE. HOWEVER, WE MUST STRIVE (JIHAD) TO OUR VERY BEST NOT TO BREAK THE QUR'ANIC COMMANDMENTS. WE MUST REPENT ON A DAILY BASIS AND STAY ON THE RIGHT PATH. WE MUST WIN THE HOLLY STRUGGLE (JIHATUL NAFS). ALLAH, OUR CREATOR AND SUSTAINER KNOWS OUR HEARTS. THERE ARE NO EXCUSES. INSHA'ALLAH, WITH PURE HEARTS AND A SINCERE SEARCH AND ACQUSITION OF KNOWLEDGE OF OUR DEEN, WE WILL GAIN STRONG CONVICTION AND CERTAINTY IN OUR DEEN. LASTLY, BY AVOIDING AND ABSTAINING FROM MAJOR SINS AND REPENTING FROM MINOR ONES, WE WILL BE AS ALLAH PROMISES "THE SUCCESSFUL ONES."


Page 2 of 2  <  1 2

ADD YOUR COMMENT
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.


           

Support & Donate




AltMuslimah @ On Faith











Imam Khalid Latif and Haroon Moghul ask, "Why Me, Allah?"
Click here to read more!