|
|  |
By Zehra Rizavi, June 15, 2009
Asra Nomani's new documentary, The Mosque in Morgantown - airing tonight on PBS - exemplifies the great American and Islamic tradition of questioning authority. But although Nomani is certainly one such challenger, Nomani seems to undercut her own objective and isolate herself as an outlier in the community by imposing her approach on others who share her views. |
|
A new PBS documentary, The Mosque in Morgantown, which airs nationwide tonight at 10 pm ET, goes beyond the standard headlines of a “sensational female rebel in a small town mosque” to present a nuanced, complex portrait of the conflicts within a community, a mosque and a woman. Since the tragedy of September 11, many mosques in the U.S. have felt under siege, adopting defensive postures towards anyone who criticized them. Typically the attacks came from non-Muslims, but in sleepy Morgantown, it was an insider, a member of the Morgantown mosque who began to rock the boat. Asra Nomani, a former Wall Street Journal correspondent, returns from Pakistan to her hometown with her infant son and the knowledge that her dear friend and colleague, Daniel Pearl, has been captured and beheaded by Pakistani men who perverted Islam to rationalize his murder. She seeks refuge in her local mosque, but finds herself uneasy with the rules governing the community’s place of worship.
Nomani begins to protest the cordoning off of the women’s prayer space, insisting that women be given adequate space to pray in the main hall. She considers her protests an indictment of the community’s inability to rectify a situation which she believes has no religious sanction within Islam. Nomani feels she can not afford to handle this problem with half-measures and diplomacy; in Normani’s mind, the stakes require nothing less than a revolution. She invites a storm of media attention in what she sees as a fight for a more egalitarian mosque, but others in the community, specifically the moderates, believe she should modify her approach, adopting a path of incremental change of a conciliatory nature. The documentary quickly sets the stage for a struggle between these competing paths to social change.
As the documentary continues, Nomani’s fight evolves; she had embarked on her journey of activism with the single goal of awarding women equal prayer space in the main hall, but Nomani then begins to campaign for women being allowed to stand beside men in the congregational prayer. Finally, she joins a prayer hall of both men and women who stand behind Muslim scholar, Amina Wadud, as she leads them in prayer. For the moderates who have been pitted against her, as well as the viewers following Nomani’s story, it seems as though she is confused as to what precisely she hopes to achieve and ambivalent about her identity as an American Muslim woman. Her struggle against conservative traditions in American mosques begins to overlap with her aversion for intolerance and extremism. The viewer feels compelled to echo the sentiment of a woman in the documentary who asks why Nomani automatically links inadequate prayer spaces for women in mosques to violence and extremism.
Once Nomani’s activism shifts from an insistence for women’s right to pray in the main halls of their mosques to the demand that women stand amidst men while praying and lead mixed gender prayers, she becomes even more estranged from the moderate majority. Cordoning the women to a small prayer space above or below the main hall of a mosque is typically the result of cultural norms imported by immigrants from patriarchal societies. Women’s visibility in the main prayer hall often reflects their status and participation in the mosque and therefore, Nomani’s initial call for equal, adequate prayer space for her sisters seems a reasonable and valid one to the moderates. Her demand is backed by the Prophet’s (pbuh) unequivocal ruling that Muslim women enjoy the right to pray in the mosque; when women find themselves relegated to the sidelines, neither seen nor heard (and unable to see or hear), they are being denied access to a place of worship which the Prophet (pbuh) has already opened to them. The mosque’s leadership then stands culpable of violating a clear Prophetic command.
However, most of the members of the mosque, who sit squarely in the middle of the religious spectrum, feel that if women such as Nomani are going to empower themselves by pointing to textual evidence of their rights within Islam, then they must not try to circumvent the limitations of those rights. They feel there is no textual evidence, neither in the Qur’an nor the hadith, to support the idea of women leading their male counterparts in prayer or women praying alongside men—and by this I am referring to women interspersed with men in the prayer congregation, not women standing adjacent to the men separated by a few feet. It is important to note that men and women do pray in an intermingled congregation in the Holy Shrine of Mecca but the vast majority of scholars attribute this anomaly to space and logistical concerns.
Edina Lekovic, the Communications Director at the Muslim Public Affairs Council, approaches Nomani at one point in the documentary and suggests that while she respects Normani’s passion and her struggle to garner equal and adequate prayer space for women, by zeroing in on the issue of women leading prayer Nomani is adopting an extremist stance of her own and thereby lending credence to misogynists within Islam who are all too eager to dismiss all women as potential radicals who must be kept in check. Lekovic goes on to say that by pushing this issue, Nomani risks distracting from more important indicators of women’s empowerment in their mosques—women serving on the mosque’s governing board or the community inviting female scholars and guest speakers to share their ideas at the mosque.
Lekovic invites Nomani to adopt issues and a methodology that resonate with the moderate majority. Her suggestion crystallizes the problem Muslim moderates within the Morgantown mosque, as well as across the country, have with Nomani. Nomani is convinced that the systemic inequality between the male and female members of the mosque can only be stomped out by a revolution of sorts. She dispenses with dialogue in her hope to level the playing field for Muslim women. The moderate contingency of her community find her tactics confrontational and lacking nuance; as a result these potential allies are left feeling alienated. They feel her mission for reform is better served by working with the men and women in the mosques who share the aspiration for reform in the Muslim community.
Questioning authority is a great American and Islamic tradition. The schools of thought and jurisprudence we find in classical Islamic law today are the product of those who dared to challenge the authority and the status quo of their time and place. Nomani is certainly one such challenger but by imposing her approach on others who share her views, Nomani seems to undercut her own objective and isolate herself as an outlier in the community. Zehra Rizavi is Associate Editor of Altmuslimah.
13 COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE
We try to remove any comments that do not conform to our netiquette guidelines. If any comments remain that are in violation, please let us know. The presence of offending comments does not necessarily reflect the views of the editors of altmuslimah.com
Unfortunately, I only caught the tail end of this documentary. But if I ran into Asra Nomani in DC I wouldn’t treat her as an outlier, even if I didn’t agree with the battles she chose.
I personally think its OK not to have interspersed prayer, despite that being the norm in Mecca, although I think that more shared space and visibility on other occasions is healthy. However, people can raise challenges and just have a mutually respectful conversation about them. That is pluralism. Although humans hurt each other sometime, I don’t believe in using religion to that end.
- Posted by Saadia on June 15, 2009 at 11:05 PM
Ms. Rizavi, while quoting Lekovic of MPAC for support, manages to express her own opinions on Nomani’s campaign. And she does so without giving Nomani the opportunity to rebut. Not the best journalistic practice.
Muslim women continue to fester in the blatant misogynism that Islamic practices the world over comprise of. Nomani is the one voice of courage that needs to supported, especially by Muslim women, such that meaningful change can be heralded in. Tragically Muslim women themselves, ala Rizavi, appear to be the staunchest chamions of the status quo.
Darvaish,
The disagreement is mostly on methodology, rather than substance. Champions of change must also be champions of effective methods of bringing that change.
- Posted by asmauddin on June 17, 2009 at 11:49 AM
Asmauddin,
Here’s lies the problem. You can argue about the methodology all you want but the truth of the matter is that apart from Nomani there isn’t any other woman fighting the fight—with or without the right methodology. Without her this topic wouldn’t even be part of the conversation.
I find it ABSOLUTELY pathetic that Muslim women accept being accommodated in the dark crevices of the mosques of this country as fait accompli. I can assure you if we had more Nomanis, Muslim women would be far more advanced than they are today.
Many of the women who participated in the women-led prayer are fighting the fight. Nomani is not alone. We have Amina Wadud, Saleemah Abdul Ghafur, etc. Then there are scholars like Asma Barlas, Ingrid Mattson, etc.; on a global level, we have WISE (http://www.asmasociety.org/wise/) and the Musawah network. We have Dalia Ziada in Egypt and other women in other countries. Few women interested in women’s rights are cool with the status quo.
- Posted by asmauddin on June 17, 2009 at 12:22 PM
Asmauddin: The Waduds and Mattsons of the Islamic world have existed for over 1400 years. Together they haven’t managed to make an iota of difference to the over all decretitude of the Muslims in general and the Muslim women in particular. On the contrary, Muslim women of today are even more suppressed, even more molested, even more subjugated, and even more downtrodden than they were during Iron Age Arabia of 1400 years ago. And things are getting even worse thanks to such charlatans as Farhat Hashmi and other Saudi funded ultra-fundo nutjobs.
Nomani, on the other hand, is the only woman ever to have taken the fight directly to the mosque, which remains the ultimate citadel of god-sponsored misogynism. For Rizavi to pooh pooh her approach is tantamount to sabotage.
Dervaish,
It is admirable that you support the plight of Muslim women seeking to achieve equal treatment in mosques across America, such as Asra Nomani. However, I find some of your comments insulting to the countless sisters who strive to make a difference in their communities on a daily basis. On my college campus, the women on the governing board were more active than the men and drastic change for the better was made over the course of a couple years. The newly built or newly renovated mosques this country in particular tend to have very nice, if not nicer, areas for women to pray solely fueled by local women’s activist efforts. To claim Nomani is “the only woman ever to have taken the fight directly to the mosque” is not only naive, it’s preposterous. By doing this you are slandering the very women whose cause you claim to support.
Furhermore, judging from the results Nomani achieved in Morgantown via her uncompromising tactics—i.e. no concrete change and her ultimately leaving the mosque, conveniently at the conclusion of her book tour—clearly there was something lacking in her methodology. What does it tell you when you get confronted by the board of the “most progressive mosque in America” (in southern California) for disrespectful behavior? To me it would say “maybe I myself am being extreme in my tactics.“ The fight for equal accommodations is not equivalent to praying in the same rows as the men, where her flawed logic eventually took her. She should have aligned herself with other Muslim women instead of claiming to be the sole agent of change.
Lastly, Ms. Rizavi’s piece is an editorial review, it is not an objective journalistic piece and should not be viewed as such. And for her to respectfully disagree with Nomani is her right as a Muslim woman and productive in further bringing this debate to the mainstream. The very fact that she has done so in this forum separates her from the those who accept the status quo; to lump her in with such a group as you have is unfair and unfounded.
- Posted by Zumar on June 17, 2009 at 07:52 PM
Ms. Rizavi’s review is reflective of very high standards of professional journalism; balanced, accurate and comprehensive. Further, by definition a reviewer is expected to express ones opinion, if he/she does not do that then there is no point in writing a review.
Regarding Ms. Nomani, she deserves credit to have made the first move in bringing about change in the way women were being treated in the Morgantown mosque. But later she undermined her cause by becoming distracted by her desire to seek publicity and promote her book. I wish she had been more sophisticated in her methods. It was a pity sees her being turned away even from a mosque that she herself described as the “most progressive” mosque in America.
- Posted by Saqib on June 17, 2009 at 07:54 PM
Thanks for taking the time to read my piece. My understanding of a review is that the writer offers his/her assessment or evaluation of the documentary/movie/book. Reading the writer’s opinion is part and parcel of a review.
While I would like to meet and speak with Nomani, I feel the documentary was her opportunity to present her case and explain her campaign. I consider my review a response to her presentation of her views so I don’t see the need for a rebuttal from Nomani.
I will have to echo Asma’s above comment when I say that my disagreement with Nomani is primarily on the particular tactics she used, not necessarily her objectives. I found her confrontational approach divisive rather than effective. It may have placed her squarely in the headlines but I have to respectfully disagree with you when you make the sweeping generalization that there is no other woman “fighting the fight.“ You may not see them in the spotlight because they employ more nuanced, collaborative means. Nomani’s belief that working within the system is futile because your voice will always be dismissed is incorrect. Here, I would point to Ingrid Mattson—a woman who rose within the ranks of ISNA, the largest Muslim-American organization, to become its President, a position of tremendous influence which allows her to create great change.
As for the substance of Nomani’s campaign, I do not dismiss her objectives as a whole. I completely supported her initial efforts to garner equal and adequate prayer space for women in the mosques—i.e. pray in the main hall directly behind the men. She lost my endorsement, and that of the moderate majority, however, when she launched a fight to allow women to lead namaz. If you could offer me some evidence or precedence from the Qur’an or Sunnah about women leading a mixed congregation in prayer, I would reconsider my opinion.
All:
If the matter wasn’t of such import, the casual reader of these comments might find much comedic farce here.
Zumar writes: “The newly built or newly renovated mosques this country in particular tend to have very nice, if not nicer, areas for women to pray solely fueled by local women’s activist efforts.“
So. Being tucked into a “nice” little corner of the mosque is an achievement for Muslim women? Wow! Whatever happened to wanting to being front and center in the main hall, side by side with the men? And Ms. Rizavi wants precedences from histoty before she would even dream of asking for equality? In other words, if it didn’t happen in the horrifically chauvanistic Iron Age Arabia of 1500 years ago then its not worth even asking for. Brilliant!
I wish you wonderful ladies much luck in your search for… nothing.
every one is entitled to what he or she wants as long as no one is harmed
- Posted by aghaamin (Djibouti) on June 18, 2009 at 10:40 AM
There is a difference between activism and the public role of ‘activist.‘The prevalance of mediated communications has an effect on the communications themselves. Getting attention from mainstream media, as Nomani has, can have a powerful effect on one. Part of that effect is that one becomes conscious of playing to a larger crowd than the one in front of you. Unfortunately, that can undermine one’s authenticity by serving to reinforce those aspects of one’s message that get the most attention. The ‘wronged, oppressed, Muslim woman’ is a meme beloved of mainstream Western media. Nomani is serving it well, and being rewarded. This dynamic undercuts the her effectiveness as a change agent in the cause she claims to espouse. She is not the only Muslim woman to fall prey to this unfortunate dynamic. It is too bad that getting caught up in reinforcing negative stereotypes undercuts genuine work to change what is wrong.
- Posted by Anas Coburn (Putney, VT) on June 18, 2009 at 01:46 PM
I haven’t seen the documentary, is the Brown vs. Board of Education case mentioned? It seems to me that the Supreme Court has already ruled on the invalidity of “separate but equal” in our society.
- Posted by Leasha on July 4, 2009 at 01:31 PM
Page 1 of 1
ADD YOUR COMMENT
|
|
|
|
Produced in partnership with
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search altmuslimah
|
|
Subscribe to newsletter and feeds
|
Multimedia 
|
Editors' blog 
News briefs for week of February 8, 2010 - This week, a study finds that abstinence-focused sex education in American schools can persuade youth to delay sexual activity, sixteen-year-old Turkish girl buried alive for talking to boys, French authorities deny citizenship to man who forces his wife to wear a full veil, and female government leaders have done little to advance women's rights in Southeast and South Asia. (February 8, 2010)  ( 1 comment) |
News briefs for week of January 25, 2010 - This week, Muzzammil Hassan changes his defense and says he was the victim; Pakistani scientist Aafia Siddiqui is on trial in New York for shooting at U.S. officials while in custody in Afghanistan; a limited burqa ban in France may be easier to pass on the grounds of security than a total ban; and a Malaysian court ends the ban of book on challenges facing Muslim women. (January 27, 2010)  ( 0 comments) |
News briefs for week of January 18, 2010 - This week, the burqa ban discussion continues in France, attempts to outlaw hair straightening are rejected in Indonesia, FGM finds new opponents in Mauritania, and Hamas’s Islamic veil project is highlighted. (January 19, 2010)  ( 0 comments) |
News briefs for week of January 11, 2010 - This week, a €700 fine for burka clad women to be voted on in France, Coptic girls continue to be kidnapped and converted to Islam, a battered women's shelter provides refuge for Muslims in Baltimore, the culprits who maimed a Pakistani woman receive unusual and severe sentences, and world religions play a key role in the oppression and liberation of women according to the Elders. (January 12, 2010)  ( 0 comments) |
News briefs for week of January 4th, 2010 - This week, violence against women in Gaza is highlighted along with a Canadian Muslim women calendar. Muslim punk music and niqab bans continue to ruffle feathers and a Chinese professor speaks out about the Uighur, predominantly Muslim, minority. (January 5, 2010)  ( 0 comments) |
|
Readers' blog 
Living up to the legacy - By historical account, being a Muslim female meant being virtuous, loving, knowledgeable, and empowered by her faith. Well it’s centuries later and although we cite to the legacy of Islam, we fail to live up to it or keep the legacy alive. (February 4, 2010)  ( 1 comment) |
Bridging literacy and cultural gaps in Pakistan - In addition to bridging cultural and socioeconomic gaps, the American International School System in Pakistan acts as an experimental model and incubator by incorporating some of the education reform principles advocated by grassroots organizations, education specialists and writers, and governmental agencies like the Ministry of Education. (January 3, 2010)  ( 1 comment) |
Islam and manhood - The infamy of Islamist terrorism over the past decade has created an image of the Muslim man as intrinsically prone to violent behavior, even if directed toward the self rather than the other. The image of the angry, flag-burning, chanting Muslim man has come to symbolize male violence. However the photos fail to explain that, firstly, the anger, in many instances, is justified, secondly, that the chants rarely spill over into to physical violence, and thirdly that violence is not exclusive to Muslim men. (December 25, 2009)  ( 4 comments) |
It’s not about the niqab, it’s about credibility - The question, which we all should consider now is why Al-Azhar scholars are not obeyed by the public any more? The simple and direct answer to this very complicated question is because Al-Azhar lost its credibility in the eyes of Egyptians. (October 17, 2009)  ( 3 comments) |
One woman’s journey toward pleasing Allah - Understanding the purpose and reasoning behind abaya is not something a Muslim girl learns the day she is born. For many, like myself, it was a slow and steady journey; one that required much research and reflection. (September 25, 2009)  ( 3 comments) |
Separation not segregation: a Muslim woman writes - By instituting a physical separation as the vessel for modesty-management the responsibility for modesty is devolved to the physical partition rather than necessarily imbuing the men and women with the social graces of modesty and respect in the way that they interact with each other. (September 24, 2009)  ( 5 comments) |
|
|