|
|  |
By Jehanzeb Dar, November 18, 2009
Mosques need to be more inclusive of Muslim women. We should encourage our sisters to be leaders in our communities, as Imams, scholars, educators, directors, activists, artists, and so on. These ideas do not stem from “Western liberalism” or “Western decadence,” but rather these values of gender equality and inclusiveness are rooted in Islam. If we do not actively oppose the sexism and misogyny in our communities, they will become permanent features of the practice of our faith. |
|
The case against partition
If we take a moment to step out of our modern day communities and step into seventh century mosques, we will find that the norms and etiquette which guided these institutions were far more open and inclusive towards women than the standards of today. There is a great deal of evidence from the Hadith to suggest that barriers between male and female mosque attendees did not exist during the time of the Prophet. For example, a hadith narrated by Ibn Abbas, the paternal cousin of the Prophet, indicates that a woman used to pray directly behind the Prophet while he led his congregation in prayer. Muslim feminist and filmmaker, Zarqa Nawaz, points out in her documentary film, “ Me and the Mosque,” that women often spoke up during mosque lectures and even refuted the speaker if they felt he was incorrect. For example, after the Prophet’s death, a woman challenged the Caliph himself, ‘Umar bin Khattab, by citing the Qur’an after Umar tried to reduce the mahr, a monetary gift a man gives to a woman before marriage. Ironically, it was ‘Umar who was ultimately responsible for relegating women to separate rooms in the mosque.
Many turn to the concept of modesty to justify the separation of men and women in the mosque; the argument goes that if women lead a mixed congregation in prayer, stand before the audience and give a lecture or pray in the same space as their male counterparts, their voice and presence will distract or possibly seduce men. While I strongly value the teachings of modesty in Islam, I posit that the manner in which most mosques practice segregation actually has a counter productive effect—it sexualizes gender relationships.
Sobia Ali, a Muslim feminist who has also contributed to the aforementioned Muslimah Media Watch, shares her perspective on the sexualization of Muslim women (emphases added): The reason mosques segregate is so that men and women do not get distracted by each other. However, the greater concern is with men’s distraction. Why? Because men could be sexually attracted to women’s bodies and this will interfere with their worship. Therefore, knowing this, and then being forced to be in a completely different space than men, does nothing but remind me that my body, my female form, is a sexual distraction to the men in the mosque. This of course makes me feel like a sex object or sexual being. While our communities spend a considerable amount of time worrying about the seductive effect a woman’s voice, body or presence may have on a male worshipper, we disregard, or at least downplay, the attraction a man’s voice or appearance may hold for a woman. During my freshman year in college, I can recall overhearing Muslim girls raving about how beautifully a Muslim man was reciting the Qur’an during prayer--and by their smiles and the tone of their voices it was clear that there was more to it than an innocent appreciation of this man’s spirituality and devotion. Some men (and women) claim that men are inherently weaker when it comes to keeping their gaze lowered and their desires in check. Somehow, when I see a Muslim woman swooning over, say, nasheed artist, Sami Yusuf, I find this claim hard to swallow. After all, a nasheed is a song in praise of Allah and the Prophet so it is not as though Sami Yusuf is singing in the same genre as Justin Timberlake!
Who’s afraid of Amina Wadud and female imams?
Amina Wadud is a Muslim feminist and scholar who made international headlines when she led Friday prayer for a mixed-gender congregation in New York on March 18th, 2005. Over 100 Muslim women and men participated in the prayer despite the controversy and protests surrounding the event. The Muslim protesters held inflammatory signs reading, “Mixed congregation today, hell-fire tomorrow,” and one of the dissenters, a young Muslim man, screamed that Amina Wadud was a “prostitute” and “whore.” Apparently, if a sister in faith is doing something conservatives disagree with, the best way to teach her about modesty is to degrade her sexuality. Who objectifies who again?
Wadud’s prayer was not the first female-led mixed-gender congregation in Islamic history, but it was the first that garnered international attention. Most of the outrage comes, unsurprisingly, from Muslim men, who argue that Islam does not permit a woman to lead a mixed-congregation. I believe these reactions reveal an underlying fear of empowered Muslim women. Men often neglect the fact that women have been treated as property, non-equals, and sex objects for centuries (and still are) by a male-dominated world. Many men, whether they’re conscious of it or not, do not want to give up their position of power and control and therefore resort to treating Islam as a rigid, monolithic faith. When women introduce new ideas into the mix of Islamic thought, interpretation and practice, they are condemned as “flouting” Islamic tradition.
Are we really taught that Hazrat Khadijah was an independent tradeswoman and yet women are not allowed to lead prayers? Are we really taught that “paradise is at the feet of your mother” and yet we can not listen to a Muslim woman deliver a khutbah? Are we really taught that Fatima Zahra, the daughter of the Prophet, will be the first person to enter the afterlife, and yet the voices of Muslim women are completely shut out at mosques? How can we truly follow the Qur’an, which teaches that men and women are equal spiritual beings, when our community treats women as inferior to men in our places of worship?
Mosques need to be more inclusive of Muslim women. We should encourage our sisters to be leaders in our communities, as Imams, scholars, educators, directors, activists, artists, and so on. These ideas do not stem from “Western liberalism” or “Western decadence,” but rather these values of gender equality and inclusiveness are rooted in Islam. I personally believe in removing the barrier and having Muslim men and women praying in the same room — with men on one side and women on the other. Separate rooms should be designed to accommodate Muslims who have more conservative views or want privacy.
If a Muslim woman leads the prayer or gives a khutbah, we should be able to see her as a spiritual, rather than a sexual being. If a man has sexual thoughts going into the Mosque, nothing — not even a physical barrier — is going to curb his sexual thoughts or desires unless he restrains himself. If we do not actively oppose the sexism and misogyny in our communities, it will persist and only move one step closer to becoming a permanent feature of the practice of our faith.
“Verily, Allah will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in their hearts” – Qur’an 13:11.
For Part 1 of this series, click here.
(Photo: boublis)Jehanzeb Dar is a Pakistani Muslim-American undergrad student and independent filmmaker. He currently blogs at Muslim Reverie, where he critiques media, writes poetry, and reflects on spirituality.
20 COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE
We try to remove any comments that do not conform to our netiquette guidelines. If any comments remain that are in violation, please let us know. The presence of offending comments does not necessarily reflect the views of the editors of altmuslimah.com
I find it fascinating that in most cases, we’re advocating to move away from 7th century norms/practices, but in the case of women’s space in the mosque, we’ve regressed and need desperately to go back to the Prophet’s time. I think in some sense this reflects the truly revolutionary nature of the Prophetic reforms.
- Posted by asmauddin on November 18, 2009 at 10:37 AM
Salamu alaikum. I agree that we need to foster women’s involvement and leadership within the masjid. But why the fixation on leading prayer and khutbah? Why on earth the desire to mix up the prayer lines? I certainly don’t feel that my salat would be improved, nor my dignity increased, by some strange dude rubbing up against me while I pray.
The salat and khutbah are ritual acts prescribed specifically in their manner by the Prophet Muhammad, God’s peace and prayers upon him. Why would it occur to us to re-formulate what he taught? Better that we try to emulate his way…
You mention our righteous foremothers in Islam - very good point. Do we feel that we are more knowledgeable than Sayyida Khadija (ra) or Aisha (ra) to lead a mixed-gender prayer or give khutbah while they did not? Yet they were a source of knowledge and guidance for the entire Muslim Ummah…
I think there are many roles where women can and have been very influential throughout Islamic history and in the masjid environment - as scholars, lecturers, teachers, mentors, counselors. Manager, board of directors, mosque president, sure, women have much to contribute in all these areas. But Imam? Khatib?... What are we really seeking to gain from this particular role of ritual service to Allah? Do we feel our reward with Allah is lacking otherwise?
I do agree that the physical space of modern masajid is often very isolating and discouraging of women’s attendance. Yet we don’t need to invent a new design - we are Muslims, so we must believe that the best model is the Prophet’s (saws) model: an open space hosting a single jama’a - men in front, women behind, but arranged so all can see, hear, and participate.
- Posted by milkweed on November 19, 2009 at 12:12 AM
I agree with milkweed in that there needs to be a distinction between female leadership generally and the specific roles of khateeb and imam for prayers involving men, as well as mixed gender prayer lines. But I am not entirely sure if Jehanzeb is advocating for mixed gender prayer, since he does state clearly: “I personally believe in removing the barrier and having Muslim men and women praying in the same room — with men on one side and women on the other.“
Women can lead prayers for women-only congregations, and this actually happens in China where women-only mosques exist. Perhaps a true push for Muslim female spiritual leadership in the US, in line with commonly accepted boundaries, requires that such women-only spaces be created in the US as well.
- Posted by asmauddin on November 19, 2009 at 10:49 AM
>>far more open and inclusive towards women than the standards of today.
One thing we need to notice is that in Medina, most of the people knew each other and often were related in some way. They were tightly bonded and could trust that others would not engage in improper relations with thier female kinfolk.
Nowadays, in many American Muslim omcommunities we have people who hardly know each other let alone trust each other with thier womenfolk. I, for one, wouldn’t trust any of the MidEastern men in many communities around my wife (and their women have such gaping gossiping mouths and even the gumption to ask my wife if we “did it” before marriage [NO]).
The South Asian sub-community seems to be less wound up and I’ve seen many of thier functions and mosques where I could trust that my wife wouldn’t be gossiped about and could move about in the whole mosque without a loss of reputation. So, the collision of cultures in our mosques matters alot, too.
This is not an excuse to perpetuate segregation, but merely one possible explanation for the difference between then and now.
- Posted by OmarG on November 19, 2009 at 11:31 AM
>>as scholars, lecturers, teachers, mentors, counselors.
Yes, we need more of that, but if they fill such roles, will we restrict them to only lecturing other women, to only teaching other women??
Also, while I agree against mixed prayer lines, I do not really see the difference between a female lecturer and a female khatib. They are basically dogin the exact same thing, which is why I brought up whether female lecturers would only lecture other women (oops, bad choice of words, since so many “sisters” lecture others about any and every flaw they see!).
- Posted by OmarG on November 19, 2009 at 11:35 AM
I think we need to make the distinction between (a) what a masjid would look like in a perfect world and (b) what we can do to make the masjid a more enjoyable experience for sisters today. Maybe for some of us a perfect masjid would have men and women praying on left and right sides, or intermixed, but let’s be real, what are the odds of that happening without polarizing the community or spinning off as another sect? There are many muslims, men and women, who would never feel comfortable in a masjid like that.
The more important question is what can we do today to improve the masjid for sisters? (The majority of sisters, and not just the liberal/progressive ones). And how can we get the entire community on board? What will it take? Education? More women on the board? Giving women a bigger “stake” in their masjid, so it feels as though it belongs to them and they are not merely guests? Voicing dissatisfaction to the masjid powers-that-be? Perhaps a “pray-in” at the back of the mens’ section?
@Asma: I didn’t know women-only mosques existed, as opposed to simply a women’s section. I think it would be neat to attend Jumah at one and listen to a female khatib. If anyone was dissatisfied with it, maybe they would feel empowered to fix it themselves as opposed to blaming the men, or waiting for a man to fix it. Like what I said earlier about making the masjid feel as though it belongs to the women.
- Posted by UmmSarah on November 19, 2009 at 12:48 PM
@Asma: It’s ultimately about choice and if people want to pray in mixed-gender congregations, I will voice my support for them. I know I wasn’t that clear in my post about what I personally believe, but I don’t think Mosques can make the immediate “jump” to a mixed-gender congregation. Not without having some form of separation of the sexes, at least. I know the Noor Center in Toronto has been successful in establishing a Mosque where women and men pray in the same room—women on one side and men on the other. Ideally, I would like to see mixed-gender congregations, which is how it is in the grand Mosque in Mecca, but I think we need to take gradual steps first.
@UmmSarah: It’s true, a lot of Muslims who hold these views about Mosques are bound to be stigmatize or even pushed out of their communities, but I think persistence is the key. Muslims who advocate for desegregated Mosques should build one, insha’Allah, and establish a strong community there. At the moment, for those who may not be able to, uh, afford building a Mosque right away, it’s important to collect as many voices as we can.
It can happen, and the Noor Center in Toronto is evidence of that. It just requires a lot of unity.
- Posted by Jehanzeb on November 19, 2009 at 03:59 PM
- Posted by asmauddin on November 19, 2009 at 07:54 PM
In China, the female imams are called nu ahong. These females are trained- as imams would be trained in some parts of the Muslim world. They hold certificates. They teach Qur’an and shari’ah, holding classes for women and girls. Many of the masjids are also schools where girls are taught both secular studies and Islamic studies. Mash’allah.
I have more hope in this sort of situation than I do with de-segregation here in the States. I think the education of women/girls in Islamic studies-history, Qur’an, sunnah, etc is a fantastic start.
- Posted by katseye on November 19, 2009 at 08:05 PM
Thank you for posting this Asma. I loved this article the first time I read it. My husband was afraid that I would decide to jump ship and move us there. If I spoke Mandarin, I probably would have. C
- Posted by katseye on November 19, 2009 at 08:08 PM
>>give women the platform they need and want to exert authority
and have leadership.
But, is it really reflective of the leadership and authority they need within the general population and in the Muslim community as a whole when they lead and teach only other women? There are very few women-only venues in any society, so I wonder if that would simply marginalize female leaders from general society even more?
- Posted by OmarG on November 19, 2009 at 08:24 PM
Personally, I think many people think of their masjids back home-a place to stop in pray. The imam may have had to read from the weekly government supplied khutbah that is generic for the most part. There isn’t all of the issues of gender politics related to the masjids so it’s hard to articulate just how painful an experience the masjid can be for some people.
- Posted by ayat on November 19, 2009 at 08:32 PM
OmarG,
Cultivation of leadership can happen in many ways, and can start in many different types of places. For some women, the comfort of an all-female space can cultivate leadership potential that may not be otherwise possible. And, in any case, it’s certainly better for female leadership than the current model is.
Katseye,
The first article I posted made it a point to say that this is a very ‘Chinese’ way of practicing Islam. I wonder what an American way of practicing Islam would look like. Maybe it’ll take a generation or so for us to see that.
- Posted by asmauddin on November 19, 2009 at 10:44 PM
“Create the space that is safe from ‘Islamic’ criticism and give women the platform they need and want to exert authority and have leadership.“
I want to focus on what you called ‘Islamic’ criticism. Why this is distinct from other types of information processing is that people can fall easily into dogmatic agendas, without even realizing it. If there is too much information traveling between third-parties, then the problem can become exacerbated. Any woman I’d ask would probably say that it would be highly undesirable. However, an imposition of other world views can happen in other societies, not just Muslim ones.
A “space” of sorts is needed and is often formed by women themselves, so they can talk and express themselves more freely. It can happen with or without a physical separation. However, opening up spaces can make it easier for women to be visible and possibly express their identity to men as well, creating a better exchange and allowing a balanced outlook for common projects.
- Posted by Saadia on November 28, 2009 at 03:48 PM
“For some women, the comfort of an all-female space can cultivate leadership potential that may not be otherwise possible. And, in any case, it’s certainly better for female leadership than the current model is.“
Asma, if the current model you are referring to is the hyper-sexualization of women, then there are several things to think through - particularly since so much time has been invested on this blog in talking about how over-segregation hypersexualizes women in the manner of Saudi Arabia.
- Posted by Saadia on November 28, 2009 at 05:38 PM
The only problem I have with this article is that it is in the AltMuslimah which implies that this is a problem for women when it is in fact a problem for all Muslims. It saddens me that we build these wonderous structures to the glory of Allah and then exclude 50% of the population from participating in prayers by relegating women to cellers and back rooms. Its come to a point where I feel guilty about contibuting money to my local mosque knowing that this mosque is also responsible for segregating and providing inferior facilities for women.
I would be pleased and completely comfortable with a mosque where women worship on one side of the main hall on men on the other. If anybody can provide details of such a mosque, I would be happy to donate money to them.
- Posted by XManNY on January 10, 2010 at 02:45 PM
XManNY - thanks for your comment. Please note, however, that altmuslimah (despite what its name implies) is not just for women but for men and women, Muslims and non-Muslims, interested in exploring issues related to gender-in-Islam.
Also, please stay tuned for an article we’ll be posting soon on women-only mosques in China and how those can serve as a model for us here in the US.
- Posted by asmauddin on January 10, 2010 at 03:23 PM
XManNy: I think that the Islamic Center of Maryland has improved in that although there are some spaces that are segregated, there are others (like the library) which are combined space. Neither has led to much problem.
However, there is a curtain between the men and women’s spaces that can be opened for lectures. I’ve never seen an objection from the men’s side when it has been opened. However, some women, despite their everyday lives (e.g. going to the store, etc.) find it offensive - perhaps believing it to be a sin in a sacred space.
I personally don’t think its a sin, but if other women do, I think it would accommodate more preferences if they just sit on the side where the curtain isn’t open. Sometimes what happens though, is that someone will get mad and close it again.
Anyways, if you’d like to donate go here: http
http://www.icomd.org/
They are developing over time.
- Posted by Saadia on January 10, 2010 at 09:01 PM
Regarding the articles that have been written about the “Divine” and whether oversegregation leads to hypersexualization…
Some of the issues may be more true for more conservative areas of the world where there are a lot of burka-wearing women, and yet you may hear of rich men who still do things like sex-trafficking or act out of frustration.
In many parts of the world, people see women as an everyday occurence so they get used to it - they don’t stare so much.
I think the objectification of women has to be pursued purposely in some cases.
- Posted by Saadia on January 10, 2010 at 09:18 PM
“Also, please stay tuned for an article we’ll be posting soon on women-only mosques in China and how those can serve as a model for us here in the US.“
I did understand the implications of Asma’s comment and share the sentiment for private space. But I feel some places really need to be more private than others - the bathhouses that adjoin the Paris mosque for example, are segregated and very lax. I also try to attend women’s only gyms, or when they are integrated, I most often make trade offs according to the crowd level and situation (like if its “just us” in class or a limited integration that won’t harm my safety or take from my dignity.)
While some women may feel that mosques are particularly holy spaces where they should have privacy from men, I feel its OK to have some spaces that are integrated, while others are more private/relaxed.
That is what they are doing at ICM, incrementally, and I think they are getting some protection in that regard. Other things like fundraising are happening very quickly.
- Posted by Saadia on January 11, 2010 at 09:42 PM
Page 1 of 1
ADD YOUR COMMENT
|
|
|
|
Produced in partnership with
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search altmuslimah
|
|
Subscribe to newsletter and feeds
|
Multimedia 
|
Editors' blog 
News briefs for week of February 8, 2010 - This week, a study finds that abstinence-focused sex education in American schools can persuade youth to delay sexual activity, sixteen-year-old Turkish girl buried alive for talking to boys, French authorities deny citizenship to man who forces his wife to wear a full veil, and female government leaders have done little to advance women's rights in Southeast and South Asia. (February 8, 2010)  ( 2 comments) |
News briefs for week of January 25, 2010 - This week, Muzzammil Hassan changes his defense and says he was the victim; Pakistani scientist Aafia Siddiqui is on trial in New York for shooting at U.S. officials while in custody in Afghanistan; a limited burqa ban in France may be easier to pass on the grounds of security than a total ban; and a Malaysian court ends the ban of book on challenges facing Muslim women. (January 27, 2010)  ( 0 comments) |
News briefs for week of January 18, 2010 - This week, the burqa ban discussion continues in France, attempts to outlaw hair straightening are rejected in Indonesia, FGM finds new opponents in Mauritania, and Hamas’s Islamic veil project is highlighted. (January 19, 2010)  ( 0 comments) |
News briefs for week of January 11, 2010 - This week, a €700 fine for burka clad women to be voted on in France, Coptic girls continue to be kidnapped and converted to Islam, a battered women's shelter provides refuge for Muslims in Baltimore, the culprits who maimed a Pakistani woman receive unusual and severe sentences, and world religions play a key role in the oppression and liberation of women according to the Elders. (January 12, 2010)  ( 0 comments) |
News briefs for week of January 4th, 2010 - This week, violence against women in Gaza is highlighted along with a Canadian Muslim women calendar. Muslim punk music and niqab bans continue to ruffle feathers and a Chinese professor speaks out about the Uighur, predominantly Muslim, minority. (January 5, 2010)  ( 0 comments) |
|
Readers' blog 
Living up to the legacy - By historical account, being a Muslim female meant being virtuous, loving, knowledgeable, and empowered by her faith. Well it’s centuries later and although we cite to the legacy of Islam, we fail to live up to it or keep the legacy alive. (February 4, 2010)  ( 1 comment) |
Bridging literacy and cultural gaps in Pakistan - In addition to bridging cultural and socioeconomic gaps, the American International School System in Pakistan acts as an experimental model and incubator by incorporating some of the education reform principles advocated by grassroots organizations, education specialists and writers, and governmental agencies like the Ministry of Education. (January 3, 2010)  ( 1 comment) |
Islam and manhood - The infamy of Islamist terrorism over the past decade has created an image of the Muslim man as intrinsically prone to violent behavior, even if directed toward the self rather than the other. The image of the angry, flag-burning, chanting Muslim man has come to symbolize male violence. However the photos fail to explain that, firstly, the anger, in many instances, is justified, secondly, that the chants rarely spill over into to physical violence, and thirdly that violence is not exclusive to Muslim men. (December 25, 2009)  ( 4 comments) |
It’s not about the niqab, it’s about credibility - The question, which we all should consider now is why Al-Azhar scholars are not obeyed by the public any more? The simple and direct answer to this very complicated question is because Al-Azhar lost its credibility in the eyes of Egyptians. (October 17, 2009)  ( 3 comments) |
One woman’s journey toward pleasing Allah - Understanding the purpose and reasoning behind abaya is not something a Muslim girl learns the day she is born. For many, like myself, it was a slow and steady journey; one that required much research and reflection. (September 25, 2009)  ( 3 comments) |
Separation not segregation: a Muslim woman writes - By instituting a physical separation as the vessel for modesty-management the responsibility for modesty is devolved to the physical partition rather than necessarily imbuing the men and women with the social graces of modesty and respect in the way that they interact with each other. (September 24, 2009)  ( 5 comments) |
|
|