Friday, September 10, 2010 | 01 Shawwal 1431  
Clothing
Many layers: Examining the complex meanings of hijab
Writer Fatima Ayub examines perspectives on veiling in Muslim majority and minority contexts, both in the United States, where she grew up, and in Afghanistan, where she has lived and worked. She finds a surprising number wear it due to a combination of social expectation and cultural habit, rather than solely a religious act, illustrating the diversity of thought and behavior that surrounds the hijab.
The idea and practice of hijab are endlessly contested, by Muslims and others alike. As the recent discussions on altmuslimah suggest, there is no conformity of opinion about the veil. Cultural norms, religious interpretation and the individual exercise of faith all play roles in determining the ‘meaning’ of hijab. Nothing in past or present trends suggest that a single coherent definition or mode of practicing hijab will emerge.

There are two fairly popular (and largely inexact) reasons offered to young Muslims when they query the significance of the hijab as a religious practice: that it is an outward expression of personal modesty, and that it obviates the lure of female beauty from the male gaze. Amongst the Muslim community where I was raised in the United States, though a large and open one, the obligation itself to veil was largely unquestioned, though those who follow this debate closely know that even this point is not uncontested.

In my own experience, having lived and worked in both the U.S. and Afghanistan, the hijab fulfills neither of these popularly prescribed functions. Given the variety and complexity of human behavior, certainly not all women who wear hijab adhere more rigorously to Islamic moral codes, nor is hijab an effective means of desexualizing male and female interaction. I do not suggest, of course, that women who wear hijab do not do so as an act of worship, or that anyone who sees a veiled woman should not respect her integrity, but that in itself, the hijab is neither a barometer of a moral and ethical decision-making, nor is it a shield for the female from the eyes of men.

I grew up in the U.S., where young Muslim women enjoy considerable freedom to make decisions about religious practice. There, hijab has taken on a multiplicity of definitions and forms. Some find themselves forced to veil by demanding parents or spouses, while others find themselves compelled to unveil as a result of social pressure. Others imitate the patterns observed around them -- close friends and family members may veil and this motivates the young women to do the same. Yet others may veil and unveil at different points in life as the practice changes in meaning for them. Still others embrace veiling because they consider it tantamount to an act of worship. This is not intended to be an exhaustive list, but simply illustrates the diversity of thought and behavior that surrounds the hijab.

In Afghanistan, by contrast, where conservatism and patrimony are stronger social forces than religious orthodoxy, the veil is problematized in different ways. It has unarguably been deployed as a tool of social, ethnic and religious control, most notably during Taliban rule, where the presumed ethnic majority fused political control, tribal practice and cultural prejudice to enforce universal, full-body veiling for women in public. The early 20th century saw the veil banned by an enterprising and modernizing monarch, who condemned the veil as backward. There are women who retain their burkas out of habit, others who wear it to conform, and more still who continue wearing it to limit the endless taunts and jeers that all Afghan women face in public.

Patterns of veiling in Afghanistan reveal curious paradoxes. Wearing some form of veil, whether a burqa, a scarf wrapped loosely about the head and shoulders that may or may not slide off, or a thin gauzy wrap (most popular amongst elderly women), no one is seen in public without one or the other. Even international workers, anxious not to seem so conspicuously foreign, will cover their heads in public.

And yet for all this, for few women does the veil carry any personal connotation as a religious act. It is more a combination of social expectation and cultural habit, or worn as a half-measure against sexual harassment. From an orthodox view, the veil is worn to cover the head and upper torso in the presence of unrelated males. Almost no one, young or old, who I’ve asked in Afghanistan, says they wear the veil because of a sense of personal religious obligation, and they veil themselves only when they are moving from one place to another. The one exception may be among Afghan women whose families lived in Iran for a longer time; these women are seen wearing veils that closely cover the hair, neck and shoulders (but not their faces), with a long black cloak draped around them when in the streets.

As mentioned, Afghan women inevitably face sexual harassment every time they are in public on their own. For my own part, I am always dressed conservatively, with a close-fitting veil that fully covers my hair and a loose black wrap around my torso. Walking down the street in Kabul is an ordeal. Everywhere men stare, whisper, comment on your appearance and grope if they catch you in close enough quarters. I had a highly amusing exchange with one of my house guards, Hakim, about how to assess whether a woman in a burqa was beautiful--by looking at her hands, shoes and the gait of her walk, if anyone wants to know. So even those in full body veils cannot escape the perpetual conjecture and harassment.

In Afghanistan, it seems the burqa is not a marker of male oppression, as some would superficially claim. Rather the enduring question and problem is of defining women’s role in the public space. Afghan society adamantly assigns all things beyond the realm of the private to males, though this is slowly changing. The veil is largely a by product of this contest for space and social inclusion.

No immutable conclusions can be drawn from comparing the experience of veiling in the U.S. and Afghanistan, but the fundamental difference towards veiling among Muslims females in the U.S. and Afghanistan is that of agency. In the U.S., the broader cultural trend is not to veil, and women are more able to exercise their choice to assume the hijab for any number of reasons. In Afghanistan, veiling is largely a culturally enforced practice devoid of personal religious reflection. The contrast should force us to keep questioning assumptions about the intersections between belief, behavior and norms with respect to the veil and other Islamic practices.

(Photo: Jennifer Hayes)

Fatima Ayub is a Contributing Writer to Altmuslimah.



14 COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

ADD YOUR COMMENT
You must be logged in to leave comments.

Produced in
partnership with

Founder & Editor-In-Chief
Asma T. Uddin

Executive Editor
Zahed Amanullah

Publisher
Shahed Amanullah

Associate Editors
Sarah Jawaid
Anjum Malkana
Zehra Rizavi

Multimedia Editor
Fatima Bahloul

Contributing Editors
Fatemeh Fakhraie
Abbas Jaffer

Events and Publicity
Shazia Riaz

Support Altmuslimah


Search altmuslimah


Subscribe to newsletter and feeds




See more of Altmuslimah's photographic campaign

NISI Fashion (Anisa Noormohamed , April 10, 2010)
Episode Four: Headscarf (Crystal Quallo, March 19, 2010)
Fashion Week: Malaysia (Vincent Thian/AP Photo, November 15, 2009)


News briefs for week of August 23, 2010 - This week, A Bangladesh court ruled that people cannot be forced to wear religious clothing, a youth organization in Massachusetts urges officials for more comprehensive cultural sensitivity training of teachers, Emirati women frequent hair salons less during the month of Ramadan, and the Christian Science Monitor describes the pro-women's rights stance of one of the leaders behind the proposed Islamic center near ground zero. (August 24, 2010) (0 comments)

News briefs for week of August 16, 2010 - This week, the government of Afghanistan releases statistics on alarmingly high suicide attempt rates by Afghan women, and an Islamic theologian recounts his experience on a nudist beach that led to his conversion to Islam. (August 17, 2010) (0 comments)

Ramadan: A wife’s perspective (and a husband’s) - When my husband finally makes his way down the stairs, my frustration abates and he and I sit across from each other and share our early morning meal. We speak intermittently and keep one eye trained on the clock to ensure we finish our food by the time dawn prayers begin. Despite the sparse conversation and the hurried meal, I enjoy the feeling that we are both beginning our obligatory fasts together, as a unit. (August 13, 2010) (1 comment)

News briefs for week of August 9, 2010 - This week in the news, why pregnant women exempt from fasting still fast, Taliban responds to TIME's cover story on Aisha, Satirist claims he is not joking about his plans to open an Islamic gay bar next to Cordoba Mosque, and a young American Muslim man abstains from alcohol and dating for the month of Ramadan. (August 10, 2010) (0 comments)

News briefs for week of August 2, 2010 - Brazil offers asylum to Iranian women sentenced to death by stoning, veiled women pass through Canadian airport checkpoint without being checked, Malaysian reality show crowns its champion imam, and a few British gay Muslims find support from their local imams. (August 3, 2010) (0 comments)

News Briefs for the week of July 24, 2010 - This week, Saudi clerics seek more Muslim maids and say its okay for women to uncover their faces in the presence of burqa bans. Two French women in burqinis were refused entry into a pool, and two Muslim women in England are not allowed onto a public bus. (July 27, 2010) (0 comments)

Intern Icon

Founder & Editor-In-Chief
Asma T. Uddin

Executive Editor
Zahed Amanullah

Publisher
Shahed Amanullah

Associate Editors
Sarah Jawaid
Anjum Malkana
Zehra Rizavi

Multimedia Editor
Fatima Bahloul

Contributing Editors
Fatemeh Fakhraie
Abbas Jaffer
Events and Publicity
Shazia Riaz
Our mission | Our partners| In the news | Contact us | Submit an article | Advertising