On the marriage of Imran Khan

The New Year has begun, and by all indications, Pakistan is going to be as messed up in 2015 as it was in 2014, 2013, 2012… you get the idea. Things don’t look good for this beloved banana republic of ours, with terrorists breathing down our neck, military courts and death penalties, economic woes, and foreign policy Gordian knots that just keep tying themselves up again the moment someone brings a sword this way.

Yet the one matter of greatest importance on everyone’s minds (and tongues) is the marriage of Imran Khan. “Did he or didn’t he?” has surpassed “To be or not to be” in the ranking of soliloquies, drawing room chatter is all about the PTI leader’s relationship with the lovely Reham Khan, and news anchors are throwing all manner of coy hints that they knew about it before it happened, and that they still know more about it than we do but aren’t going to tell us exactly what they know (shades of Donald Rumsfeld).

There’s something very childish in all of this speculation. In many countries, people believe that a politician’s private life is his own matter. Not so Pakistan, where we have no sense of boundaries, privacy, or personal space. Here, we tend to think that a politician’s religious status and relationship status are one and the same, in that both are matters for public consumption. And especially in the case of Imran Khan, people think that his personal life is their public property.

I’m not saying Imran Khan is completely innocent in this state of affairs. He’s lived and loved wildly, and it’s common knowledge, which is part of the territory of being a celebrity. He announced from the top of his container towards the beginning of the dharnas that he wanted to get married, which some claim makes the matter of his marriage part of the public domain. Fair enough. Khan also capitalises on his own reputation as a sex god and ladies’ man, using it in not so subtle ways to gain the loyalty of his many admirers and turn that sexual capital into political capital. Whatever it takes — and any politician who’s lucky enough to be good-looking would do the same.

But here’s where it gets tricky: the double standards in Pakistan towards the sexual freedom of men versus the sexual repression of women have complicated things needlessly for the Kaptaan. And he’s finding that the freedom he enjoyed as a man doesn’t extend to the woman he supposedly wants to make his wife.

By all accounts Reham Khan is a woman who has also lived fully. She’s been married before, just like Khan, and has three grown children. She was a weather presenter for the BBC in the UK (I refuse to demean her with the sexist term “weather girl”), and was on her way to being a minor celebrity in that media-obsessed culture. Then she moved to Pakistan, where she got a job anchoring for AAJ and now Dawn.

She is a good-looking, vibrant and educated woman, and is the very opposite of the village virgin that most Imran Khan supporters think is the only kind of person “good enough” for a man who’s hardly lived a monk’s life. And good for him, if he found this kind of woman more appealing than a young woman not much older than a child. A man who isn’t threatened by a woman’s desire to live life on her own terms is a man who is more secure in his masculinity than an insecure man who needs to have a blank canvas as a partner.

All well and good, until the minute her name was linked with Imran Khan. And then she was dragged through the mud. Detractors of the politician dug up old photos of Reham wearing dresses and a video showing her dancing the tango at some sort of charity event. The worst kind of slander flew about her character and what she had to do to get into the BBC (baseless, without proof, and extremely sexist).  Some of this came from his detractors, but much of the anger came from PTI supporters who felt betrayed that this might be Khan’s choice of life partner. “We want what’s best for him and she isn’t it!” was the refrain.

It was like listening to an angry mother in law claiming that a wicked woman had “phassa-oed” her innocent son.

Kudos to her for having handled this pretty gracefully; many people would crack under the strain. Imran Khan’s been the one showing the pressure, as he refuses to confirm or deny the rumours that they got married somewhere back in the later part of 2014. We keep being told there will be a “big announcement” soon and in the meantime all sorts of ridiculous speculation is going on that he flew to London to get ex Jemima’s “blessings”, that his family is angry with him, so on and so forth.

All of this is really pretty pathetic when you see it for what it is: a nation stupidly obsessed with one man’s private life. Is it because we really care so much for Kaptaan’s well-being and want to choose his partner for him because we know better who’s right for him? Is it because we might be jealous that he didn’t choose one of us instead?

Or is it because speculating about his marriage is a lot more fun than actually having to face the hard truths about where this nation is really going?

I’ll let you be the judge. Heaven forbid I should actually tell you what to think, or do.


This post was originally published on the blog of Bina Shah, a Pakistani novelist. It was featured with permission from the author.


Photo Source: Zee Media Bureau


EDIT: An earlier version of this article has been corrected to reflect that Reham Khan worked for Aaj, not ARY and that she has two daughters and a son and not three sons. It also has been amended that Imran Khan made his announcement in the beginning, not end, of the dharnas.


  • sara says:

    She has indeed been at the sharp end of some very harsh criticism which is absolutely unfairm Imran too in his youth and even now is referred to in a similar way due to the liberal lifestyle he enjoyed. So it isn’t just because she’s a female.

    Some interesting albeit obvious points but your piece is riddled with inaccuracies; she has never worked for ary, she has two daughters and a son not three sons and he announced his desire to marry at the beginning of the dharna not the end.

    Weather presenter is the correct term I don’t believe even she claims to be a qualified meteorologist.

    • Hafsa Ahmad says:

      Sara, thank you for bringing the errors to our attention. We have corrected them and will notify the author.

      -Hafsa Ahmad

  • Bina Shah says:

    Thanks for pointing these out.

  • hina says:

    What was most striking to me about all the press surrounding Imran Khan’s wedding is that is coming so soon after the Peshawar attack, completely eclipsing the tragedy and throwing it into the forgotten vault of the past.

    I agree that there is a double standard when it comes to politicians, but I don’t think this is something unique to Pakistan. And I would disagree that most countries believe that a political leader’s personal life should remain private. This point can be best exemplified by the Obama family in the U.S. with the amount of press Michelle Obama and her two daughters receive– they have become celebrities in their own right.

Leave a Reply